Click Here for Discussion Forum TBP Banner Editing/Proofreading/Writing/Research Services Available.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO
Home Forum Sections
Current EventsThe ArtsSocial SciencesScience & Tech
Essay Sections
Politics/IdeologyReligion/PhilosophyTopical/CommentaryCulture
Contact



Speech Given at a Free Republic-
Sponsored Freedom Rally 10/25/2003

by William R Alford - Oct. 29, 2003

A certain class of people is furious with President George W. Bush for removing Saddam without UN approval. The first time America dealt with Saddam, Bush’s father did it the UN’s way. Let’s review how well THAT worked out.

Occasionally in a blatant case of aggression, the UN has grudgingly agreed to allow a modicum of resistance. Sometimes the aggressor would simply be stopped in his tracks. Sometimes the spoils of conquest would actually be taken away as it was for Saddam. Since the end of World War II -- removing the dictatorship that started a war has always been absolutely out of the question for the UN. 

The majority of UN member nations are not free. Having a regime that holds its power by force replaced with one that is subject to popular approval terrifies most member states -- especially those in the Middle East. So, once Saddam was ejected from Kuwait, he was allowed to retain his dictatorship. 

Expecting help or at least protection from America, the Kurds and Shi’a took up arms throughout Iraq against the Stalinist dictator. When Saddam realized that he wouldn’t be bothered so long as he kept his activities confined to the ground, he brutally crushed the rebellion. The rest of the world squawked, but did NOTHING.


War’s Aftermath and the 1990s – Sanctions, Inspections and Death



The UN placed sanctions upon Saddam’s regime only allowing enough to care for the Iraqi people, but not enough to also rebuild his military. Given the choice of one or the other, Saddam chose to starve his people while building grand palaces and feeding his power apparatus. With the gleeful participation of the international press, America was successfully tarred with the blame for the suffering that ensued for the next twelve years.

This was all FINE for the supporters of the UN. Weapons inspectors went in under Saddam’s watchful eye -- maybe they found something, maybe they didn’t. Summary executions, torture, malnutrition and disease festered while Saddam’s prestige flourished in the Arab world. The weapons inspectors were eventually ejected, but it didn’t matter. 

These were salad days for diplomats all over the world. They got to have their meetings and issue their decrees and no one questioned the process -- no matter how ineffective or harmful it was. These were happy times for the enemies of peace and freedom as well. 

North Korea knew that no one would be looking too closely at its nuclear arms treaty compliance while Bill Clinton was in office.

Yasser Arafat’s and his PLO were given more autonomy than they ever had while in any Arab country. The more power they got, the more hatred was taught to Palestinian children. HAMAS and the Islamic Jihad had a FIELD DAY. There were more suicide attacks than ever before. Whether Israel responded or not, Israel got the blame, because many inside and outside the Arab world consider the very existence of the Jewish State to be provocative.

Slobodan Milosevic and his cronies knew that they could slaughter by the thousands and no one would lift a finger to stop them. Europe did nothing. Clinton finally allowed some high altitude bombings, but far too little and far too late. 

China allowed private markets to grow, as long as they didn’t threaten the power structure and fed the military machine. Marxist in name only, China is now a fascist militaristic dictatorship that is now drawing upon nationalism to get its people used to the idea of inevitable war with the United States. Such a war is more possible now that Chinese nuclear missiles have become much more accurate and sophisticated, thanks to technology transfers that occurred under Clinton’s watch. 

When terrorists struck, Clinton responded as if they were law enforcement issues rather than acts of war. Louis Freeh’s FBI was called in, indicting a few individuals in absentia. At least they did something! Clinton would order the odd cruise missile strike or high-altitude bombing - yielding insignificant results at best. America’s enemies saw these as manifestations of impotence and cowardice. 

A few people warned that being perceived as weak actually increased our endangerment, but they were easily dismissed as hawks, warmongers and kooks. 


Terrorists Strike America - a New President Pursues a Results-Oriented Response



After two terms of Bill Clinton, a new president was sworn in. There was no honeymoon with the press. George W. Bush was portrayed at home and abroad as an inarticulate bumbler who came into office under a cloud. Seeing such spectacles as the American Civil Liberties Union attacking the Boy Scouts while defending the North American Man-Boy Love Association, our culture and will to exist appeared on the verge of collapse. To outsiders, America must have looked like a ripe fruit for the picking.

How could they think otherwise? We’re still not out of the woods yet, in that regard by the way. 

Friend and foe alike were surprised at how the America came together when 19 people chose to give their lives in pursuit of killing thousands of our men, women and children. The sleeping giant had been aroused and this time we had a president who was willing to do what needed to be done. 

This time there would be no pin pricks with cruise missiles. This time there would be no United Nations-approved war with stalemate left as the best possible outcome. This time American military power would cut out the heart of the terrorist apparatus. The regime that hosted it would also be removed - permanently. Our troops would stay there until a free, peaceful nation could be left behind. 

If the terrorists wanted to scare the United States out of the Mid-East by killing us, they have achieved the opposite result. 

There were a few who looked for blame within and bleated, ‘why do they hate us?’ An even smaller number grumbled that we had it coming, but the media knew that the American people were ill disposed to listen to the devil’s advocates at that point. For once, the Blame America First crowd was not taken seriously. 


Iraqi Freedom, International Outrage



The internationalists drew the line at Iraq, however. There was no ‘immanent threat,’ they said. The Bush administration argued that to wait until a threat is immanent would be too late. Now the media are telling us that the President had lied to the American people and the world when he said there was an immanent threat when we know that he never did.

Now the media are telling us that the Bush administration painted a rosy picture of how easy it would be to march into Iraq and that American soldiers would be welcomed with open arms. Now we are being told that all that has happened is a big surprise for which the Pentagon and White House were ill prepared. Looking back at actual statements by the President, the National Security Advisor, the Secretaries of State and Defense, we see that this is not true. 

They knew that the Iraqi people had not forgotten about being abandoned to Saddam after the Gulf War. They knew that Iraqis would likely hide rather than come out and cheer when Saddam was gone. They expected paramilitaries. They expected human shields. They expected terrorists to come in from outside Iraq’s borders. 

Before the war and in its early stages, American civilian and military leaders alike cautioned against euphoria again and again. Repeatedly Bush and his advisors warned of further bloodshed and continued challenges even after the war was over. 

We have been losing one or two Americans a week in Afghanistan for nearly two years now. That also was expected. The casualties in Afghanistan are not given anywhere near as much prominence in the media as those in Iraq. Why is that? 

Saddam had a history of using chemical weapons on enemies and even his own people. UN experts repeatedly testified of evidence that Saddam was developing bioweapons and nukes as well. 

We were supposed to wait until he hit us before stopping him? No way! Finishing a job that should have been done twelve years ago, Saddam was taken out. Saddam Hussein started two wars and killed thousands. He torched over 600 oil wells, creating an environmental disaster and economic turmoil throughout the world. 

George Bush did something far worse, according to the Illuminati, however. He didn’t follow the process. He did not subordinate American foreign policy to an international body. Now why would he do that? Does it have anything to do with the UN track record? 

Perhaps the internationalists do believe that Iraq would be better off if Saddam were still in power. But the possibility of human suffering isn’t why Bush is hated for removing Saddam the way he did. The fact that the Security Council dithered over providing humanitarian aid gives a clue to their higher priority. 

They believe that the existence of sovereign independent nations is the ultimate cause of war. Further, those who wish to build an ideal society know that it can only be done under a singular global regime. 

There have been many attempts to realize Utopia before, especially in twentieth century Europe - the birthplace of communism and fascism. Khrushchev had repeatedly said that there would be no peace so long as freedom lived somewhere in the world. Utopians know that their policies require tyranny and cause poverty. That’s harder to take for the people if they see others free and prosperous. 

This is why such people hate America. 


Who are the Elites and What Do They Want?



This country is not what it used to be, that is certain. Nonetheless, the United States of America is still the greatest nation that the world has ever seen. The reason you all know this is because you see this country firsthand - warts and all - with open hearts and minds. You have come to be skeptical of what you are told by the media and in the classroom. Your being here proves that you have made an extra effort to find out what has been distorted or ignored about this country.Your being here proves that you love America and the American people.

For others this love is not so automatic, because the knowledge that you have is not widely available. If your only source of knowledge were the media and educational elites, you would hate America as they do. The foreign media and schools are even worse. You have to work extra hard just to find the truth today. We can understand why some people would hate America if they rely exclusively upon what is fed to them from above. 

There are those who do know better and they control the reins of information. They decide what is news and how it will be presented. They decide what will be emphasized and what will be ignored. They decide what will be taught in grade school, high school and college. They write and choose the textbooks, holding sway in the classroom - praising those who go along and humiliating those who do not. 

They also dominate the entertainment industry - showing us, the American people, what they really think of us. Some Americans see this and think that this is a true picture and try and emulate it in order to fit in. This is especially true for young people. They are also presenting their image of America to the rest of the world. 

They call themselves Progressives, arrogantly asserting that theirs is the way of the future. Those who disagree with them are portrayed as Neanderthals fighting against the tide of history – turning back the clock. How lucky are we to have these Superior Beings amongst us to show which way the clock is running! How blessed are we to have these Philosopher Kings to guide America into Paradise on Earth – whether we like it or not! 


The Silent Majority Fights Back



Being anointed as they are with the ability to correctly read the tealeaves of history, they cannot tolerate an alternative message. Theirs is the orthodoxy throughout the Western world today. There is a threat to the realization of Utopia and it stands before me now. It is you. It is all of you who question their vision.

The harpies of the Brave New World recognize that a wide gulf in fundamental values separates them from the American people. The majority of Americans are committed to the survival and growth of freedom. We hold that individuals are responsible for their own actions. We believe that people are entitled to keep what they earn and are ultimately obligated to secure their own welfare and protection. 

We say that this country was founded upon noble ideals that must not only be preserved, but also be made to flourish. We believe that this country is worth defending and recognize that lives must sometimes be put at risk to do so. We honor those who unhesitatingly shed blood for the rest of us. 

President Nixon was right when he spoke of a Silent Majority that exists in America. The core of our society is represented by the likes of architects, bookkeepers, truck drivers and fire fighters. We are people who are not privileged to repose in the rarified atmosphere of the cultural elites. We are instead consigned to fend for ourselves armed only with our common sense and basic decency. Many of us are not on top of the latest trends in fashion, but we know right from wrong. We also know when someone’s trying to sell us snake oil. 

One bit of snake oil that the elites have been selling is that they are the ones who are on the cutting edge, building a plan for a modern society. By implication we who advocate for freedom are to be regarded as old fashioned – holding on to nostalgic dreams of a dark past better forgotten. I am here to tell you that they are the reactionaries. 

Don’t let them get away with calling themselves Progressive. They are the ones who believe that a cadre of elites should be more equal than others. They are the ones who think that they know what’s best for everyone else. They believe that their superiority gives them the right to lord over us uneducated masses, telling us only what they think we need to know. This stale tyrannical mindset is actually centuries old. 

Don’t let them get away with calling themselves Liberals. There’s nothing liberal about seeking to silence dissent. There’s nothing liberal about distorting education and news coverage for the purposes of indoctrination. 

I am here to tell you that freedom is the most forward-looking idea. Freedom is the most optimal human condition, not a planned Utopia. We are the ones who seek a bright future based upon the knowledge that freedom is a right we are all born with. Seeking the growth of freedom for the whole world is the true path to global peace and prosperity. 

We must all do our part to expose the would-be dictators for what they are. We must all do our part to keep America free and prosperous. I know that you will.



Sign up for PayPal and start accepting credit card payments instantly.


ANTI-SPAM/VIRUS/HACKER INFORMATION

COMPLAINTS

Boilerplate:
©Authors reserve all applicable copyrights to material posted herein.
Passages not authored by us will be attributed in accordance with 'Fair Use'
* provisions of U.S. copyright laws [as well as scholarly ethics].
 Passages authored by us may be quoted only if proper attribution is given
.


Common Sense Webring
Common Sense Webring
[ Join Now | Ring Hub | Random | << Prev | Next >> ]
guest, this site is a member of the WebRing
United States Censorship, by Charles Alexander Moffat of the Lilith Gallery
The Anti-Censorship Ring
<< Prev . List . Forum . Next >>

"Censorship is a disease that politicians
use to destroy their enemies." -JFK.

View a complete list of WebRing memberships here
This site is a member of WebRing. To browse visit here.

This website was designed and constructed using Netscape Composer, included as part of Netscape Navigator.  It's free.

Netscape Now

"Netscape Composer is an easy-to-use tool that makes creating HTML-based documents as easy as writing a memo with a word processor. HTML, or Hypertext Markup Language, describes how words and images should be displayed on a web page or in an email message. Like a word processor, Composer uses fonts, styles, paragraphs, and lists, and includes an integrated spelling checker."