|
Media
coverage had a profound effect upon the turnout in two opposing Oct. 25
2003 rallies in Washington D.C. When the two sides clashed, the media
were
absent – thus removing any motivation to curb certain behaviors as well.
International
ANSWER, sponsored the anti-war protest and the Free
Republic DC Chapter,
sponsoring
the support the troops rally. Both organizations issued press releases
to many major and local news outlets. The Worker’s
World Party-affiliated ANSWER garnered the lion’s share of the
advance
publicity while Free Republic succeeded only in a brief interview on a
local radio station and a mention on Fox News.
Attendance
expectations
were lower than expected for both rallies. On its website, ANSWER
initially
announced 100,000 attending, then declared that it was “beyond
expectations”
at 30,000. The U.S. Park Police made an estimate of 20,000 while the
New
York Times put the number at slightly above 10,000. The Free Republic
was
hoping for about 1,000 attendees, but at its maximum the crowd stood at
about 300.
Explaining
the comparative disparity in participation, Free Republic DC chapter
co-leader
Kristinn Taylor said that conservatives and libertarians suffer from
several
disadvantages in motivating the like-minded to attend. They tend to be
more oriented around a single issue, he said. Some will show up once a
year for the March for Life or a Second Amendment demonstration, but
that’s
it. Further, Taylor continued, many patriotic Americans don’t seem to
appreciate
how the anti-war spectacles can affect our troops’ morale, especially
in
absence of balancing images showing support.
This writer would add
that
protesting is a social
exercise for the Left -- part of their lifestyle. In contrast, many of
the Silent Majority probably consider such activities to be repugnant
to
observe and inconceivable to do. Additionally, those who support the
troops
tend to be more reluctant to take leave of their jobs, school and/or
families.
Another
possible explanation is the comparative awareness attributable to media
coverage. A Nexis search of anti-war news reporting over the past year
yielded these results: National news outlets – such as USA Today,
National
Public Radio and Cox News Service -- constituted 34 percent
of the stories published in the last year.
International
entities comprised 44 percent of the total – the Chinese Xinhua
and TheIrish Times showed repeated interest in these stories.
Of
the International entities, 12 percent were about multiple worldwide
protests,
while stories about protests in the U.S. and those about demonstrations
occurring elsewhere in the world stood at five percent and 15 percent
of
the total, respectively. The remaining coverage came from local news
organs.
Media
coverage of support the troops rallies has been significantly
different.
A search over the same time period had yielded zero international
coverage.
20 percent of the total were national organs, 16 percent being the AP
local
news wire, which may or may not be carried in a given publication or
broadcast.
Two percent were government news releases and an additional two percent
of the total turned out to actually be passing mentions of support the
troops rallies in stories about anti-war demonstrations. The remaining
80 percent were carried in such publications as the Cheyenne Wyo. Tribune-Eagle,
the Allentown Pa. Morning Call and the Winston-Salem N.C. Journal.
There
were distinct behavior differences as well. Before the first speeches
began
at the Support the Troops rally in front of the U.S. Capitol reflecting
pool, several men and women carrying the distinctive neon yellow ANSWER
signs arrived. They went straight for the portable toilets that the
Free
Republic had rented. When they left, it was soon found that each unit
was
liberally smeared with various forms of bodily excreta. They had not
yet
left the area when the mess was discovered, but they were only yelled
at
as they hurried away.
Also
present were about 50 members of the Protest
Warriors, who carried signs bearing messages requiring a double
take.
Examples include: “WAR HAS NEVER SOLVED ANYTHING [then in smaller
letters]
…except Slavery, Fascism, Nazism and Communism” and “END RACISM AND
SEXISM
NOW … kill all white males.” They left the rally about halfway through
the program so that they could mix themselves with the anti-war
protesters
gathered near the Washington Monument.
Protest
Warriors had previously
infiltrated a Feb. 16 San Francisco anti-war demonstration. Their
website
has a video of that event showing that there were some hostile comments
and earnest discussions, but no violence erupted. Martin Sheen was
recorded
looking very uncomfortably in the direction of the Protest Warriors as
he was escorted to the podium. Several anti-war protesters were asked
what
they thought of the Iraqi people’s treatment under Saddam. Seemingly
surprised
at the question, none were able to provide a coherent answer.
One
woman declared that if a dictator provides clean water and universal
health
care, “I like that dictator,” adding that Castro’s Cuba can boast one
of
the highest literacy rates in the region. Meanwhile, she went on, all
that
America is doing is “trying to kill everybody.”
Insofar
as Iraq is concerned, ANSWER has gone on the record saying, “The
anti-war movement here and abroad must give its unconditional support
for
the Iraqi anti-colonial resistance.” ANSWER has made no attempt to
clarify
whether this approved resistance includes sniper attacks and suicide
bombings.
For
the October demonstration, the Protest Warrior group reportedly walked
silently with their signs, speaking only when spoken to. Within minutes
of their arrival, a contingent of people wearing yellow vests with
‘ANSWER’
stenciled on the back gathered. Yelling “GET THE F— OUT OF HERE,” they
formed a line and began shoving the counter-demonstrators away, some
destroying
signs. A five-months-pregnant woman was knocked down in the fracas. Her
husband, David Fields told a Johnny
P News reporter that when he told the ANSWER people she was
pregnant,
they replied that she would continue to be pushed so long as she
remained.
The Protest Warriors verbally complained, but did not fight back.
The
independent reporter himself was struck in the head, “his
camera knocked to the ground and then kicked by a man standing” with
the
yellow-vested people. No major media personnel were present. The police
arrived afterward, and ordered the Protest Warriors to go to the other
side of the street. Talk of pressing assault charges was quelled by a
woman
announcing from the stage that there were many people on the ANSWER
side
who were prepared to testify that the counter-demonstrators had
assaulted
them.
Meanwhile,
back at the Support the Troops rally, a lone heckler arrived late to
repeatedly
give the NAZI salute and shout at Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa
during his speech. He and the other Angels ignored this. The crowd
formed
a line between him and the speaker, but he persisted in trying to go
around
or break through as he shouted. A nearby Park Policeman was called in,
the heckler finally being escorted away.
Upon
questioning, Park Police spokesman Sergeant Scott Fear explained that a
permitted demonstration group has no authority to have their own
private
security team physically force unwelcome participants away. Doing so
would
constitute assault, he added. Instead, he explained, they must inform
the
police who have sole discretion as to how the situation would be
handled.
Free
Republic members later staged a permitted counter-demonstration along
the
ANSWER parade route. Plastic bottles, eggs and other objects were
hurled
over the heads of police from the marching anti-war protesters. No
arrests,
charges or complaints are known to have been filed. ANSWER has not
responded
to repeated requests via telephone and e-mail for comment.
|