Click Here for Discussion Forum TBP Banner Editing/Proofreading/Writing/Research Services Available.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO
Home Forum Sections
Current EventsThe ArtsSocial SciencesScience & Tech
Essay Sections
Politics/IdeologyReligion/PhilosophyTopical/CommentaryCulture
Contact



Iraq & North Korea: Yesterday’s Unfinished Business, Tomorrow’s Bloodshed
by William R Alford - Mar. 28, 2003

The American people are faced with the imminent prospect of sending their youth into battle against enemies fought before, perhaps simultaneously. In each case, the first war was ended under circumstances that made the next war inevitable. How and why? The roots lie in a strategic shift from regime change to ‘containment.’ Some history:

Korea -
In the last days of WWII, Stalin seized territory from the Japanese, including what became North Korea. Unification pressures soon followed - the South preferring elections and the North favoring military force. Paranoia over growing Western influence and imperial designs persuaded an initially reluctant Stalin to facilitate Kim Il Sung’s attack in June 1950.

Truman preferred the UN to Congress in seeking a military mandate. The ensuing carnage was officially classified as a ‘police action,’ neatly bypassing any applicable Constitutional stipulations.

The invader was pushed to the Yalu River within five months. Truman then ordered the 7th Fleet to be interposed between Formosa [Taiwan] and China for fear of a wider conflict. 300,000 Chinese troops were thus freed-up to be deployed against an unsuspecting MacArthur.

Truman’s drastic post WWII disarmament further eroded his military options. Shifting forces to Asia would have left Europe vulnerable. Fear of a Third World War also loomed. One can only speculate how world history would have been altered by a demonstration of Western resolve at that crucial moment.

People’s Liberation Army General Lin Piao provides a clear indication of the opportunity lost: “I never would have made the attack and risked my men and my military reputation if I had not been assured that Washington would restrain General MacArthur from taking adequate retaliatory measures against my lines of supply and communication.”

The war was being micromanaged from Washington: “How do you bomb half a bridge,” wondered MacArthur. Stalemate was left as the best possible outcome. His open protests and contrary assessments soon cost the General his command. The war then needlessly dragged on for more than two years, finally pausing in an uneasy, two-generation armistice.


Viet Nam -
Bomb targets required prior Washington approval, continuing the micromanagement. Sources of enemy support and consolidation were typically declared off-limits. Ho Chi Minh was encouraged by the increasingly numerous and grotesque displays of self-loathing on our streets. Having victory removed as an option from the start, the resultant war of attrition was to the enemy’s ultimate advantage.

Iraq -
There was considerable US resolve to repulse Saddam’s aggression without repeating the tactical errors of Viet Nam. Accordingly, there was a clearly defined objective. Field commanders would be left to manage combate operations. Tragically however, critical strategic errors from the Korean War were retained in policy:

Once again, legitimacy for a military response was sought from the UN. The subsequent Congressional approval was welcome, but was of symbolic value only. Thus an international body composed of mostly non-democratic governments was left to determine the final objective: The Iraqi armed forces would be evicted from Kuwait, but Saddam would be allowed to retain his dictatorship.

What then, has been the result of the policy of containment? Certainly not peace or security!

  • The Korean people remain unnaturally divided. Kim Jong Il’s harsh dictatorship provides poverty domestically and weapons proliferation internationally. The People’s Republic of China has steadily grown stronger and more hostile; its people are gradually being acclimated to the inevitability of war with the US.
  • Abandoned to an eminently defeatable enemy, Viet Nam fell into dictatorship. Blood-soaked despotism subsequently spread throughout the region. The US was also shown to be an unreliable ally.
  • Unable to have both under UN sanctions, Saddam chose to continue his WMD program rather than care for his own people, who continue to languish in squalor. Aided by a compliant media, the US has successfully been tarred with the blame.

To expand on MacArthur’s famous aphorism, there are only three possible pursuits in an ongoing war: victory, surrender or a continuation of war.

As the Allies considered their ultimate objectives during the Second World War, there was no conception of leaving any Axis regime intact. It was then agreed that victory could only be defined by securing unconditional surrender followed by an occupation that would continue until the last vestiges of the aggressor regimes were eliminated. The job would be completed by a deep commitment to nurture popularly-legitimized governments and economies based upon investment and hard work rather than cronyism.

History has repeatedly shown that free societies cannot ‘contain’ or otherwise peacefully coexist with dictatorship. The Saddams and Kim Jong-Ils of the world recognize this – it is time we do also and act accordingly. If freedom is to survive, diplomatic pressure, economic sanctions and/or military force must be judiciously and methodically brought to bear with the ultimate object being the eradication of tyranny wherever it exists. Then, and only then, will there be any prospect of a lasting peace.



Sign up for PayPal and start accepting credit card payments instantly.


ANTI-SPAM/VIRUS/HACKER INFORMATION

COMPLAINTS

Boilerplate:
©Authors reserve all applicable copyrights to material posted herein.
Passages not authored by us will be attributed in accordance with 'Fair Use'
* provisions of U.S. copyright laws [as well as scholarly ethics].
 Passages authored by us may be quoted only if proper attribution is given
.


Common Sense Webring
Common Sense Webring
[ Join Now | Ring Hub | Random | << Prev | Next >> ]
guest, this site is a member of the WebRing
United States Censorship, by Charles Alexander Moffat of the Lilith Gallery
The Anti-Censorship Ring
<< Prev . List . Forum . Next >>

"Censorship is a disease that politicians
use to destroy their enemies." -JFK.

View a complete list of WebRing memberships here
This site is a member of WebRing. To browse visit here.

This website was designed and constructed using Netscape Composer, included as part of Netscape Navigator.  It's free.

Netscape Now

"Netscape Composer is an easy-to-use tool that makes creating HTML-based documents as easy as writing a memo with a word processor. HTML, or Hypertext Markup Language, describes how words and images should be displayed on a web page or in an email message. Like a word processor, Composer uses fonts, styles, paragraphs, and lists, and includes an integrated spelling checker."